Lomax v. Reynolds
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Mattie Lomax appeals from the denial of her motion to disqualify the trial judge hearing this action against a City of Miami Police Officer which stems from the officer’s purported tortious conduct.1 Lo-max’s underlying complaint recounts how Lomax allegedly was threatened by City of Miami Police Officer Reynolds in a Winn-Dixie supermarket when Lomax came to the defense of a young child, who, according to Lomax, was being yelled at by the officer. Lomax maintains that when she spoke up on the child’s behalf, the officer threatened her. Here, she appeals the denial of her motion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Safir v. United States Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Rivera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Jackson v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aquasol Condo Assoc. v. HSBC Bank USADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Aquasol Condo Assoc. v. HSBC Bank USADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018