Legal Opinion
Foster v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2003No. CIV.A.00-2227(RMU). No. CRIM.A.96-0028(RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Petitioner’s Motions
I. INTRODUCTION
More than seven years ago, this court sentenced the pro se petitioner to serve terms of imprisonment and supervised release, and directed him to pay restitution to the victims of his fraudulent activities. At the sentencing hearing, the court instructed the petitioner that his restitution payments were to “begin as soon as possible” and reiterated that such payments were “to begin immediately” in the judgment-and-commitment order. Once in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), the petitioner entered…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- La Canada Ventures, Inc. v. MDalgorithms, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- United States v. LockeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- sFox, Inc. v. Michael M. KesslerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026