Legal Opinion

Albertus v. ICOA Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Plaintiff brought this as a suit to rescind certain life insurance policies he had bought from defendant and for the return of premiums paid. The court entered a decree allowing the rescission and a judgment for the return of the premiums. Defendant appeals.

Although this was treated as a suit in equity, Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co., 1966, 243 Or 498, 414 P2d 802, decided after the instant case was tried, establishes this as an action at law. However, in the instant case this distinction is not material to our decision. If we examine the record de novo, the evidence supports the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dreiling v. Home State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Arad v. CADUCEUS SELF INS. FUND. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Perlman v. Prudential Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API