Legal Opinion
Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2008-1064PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [##45, 54] on claim eight of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, which alleges that defendant Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), in its role as statutory trustee of plaintiffs’ pension plan, erroneously interpreted the “minimum benefit” provision thereof. Both motions will be denied without prejudice because plaintiffs’ improper reliance on extra-record materials prevents the Court from fairly adjudicating the merits of the parties’ motions.
I.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Oceana, Inc. v. RossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Thomas Davis v. PBGCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013