Legal Opinion
Oceana, Inc. v. Ross
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 17, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-0829Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OCEANA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-829 (CRC) WILBUR L. ROSS in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Commerce, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS” or the “Service”) is responsible for developing management plans to promote the sustainability of particular species of ocean fish. In 2017, Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. brought a challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) to the Service’s most recent management plan for one such species: the dusky shark. The Court granted…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.