Legal Opinion

F.P. Woll & Co. v. Valiant Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 2002No. CIV.A. 99-0465Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

POLLAK, District Judge.

Currently before this court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Valiant Insurance Company (“Valiant”). After reviewing the parties’ submissions on various insurance coverage issues, this court will grant the motion for summary judgment in part and deny it in part.

Procedural Posture

In January 1999, plaintiff F.P. Woll & Company (‘Woll”) brought a diversity action against Valiant based on an insurance coverage dispute. Both Woll and Valiant filed motions for summary judgment. This court in October 2001 granted leave to Woll to file an amended…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 801, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,370 Judith S. Dici v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement Frank H. Monaco Steven B. BrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Thomas J. O'DOnnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API