Legal Opinion

Raichle, Moore, Banning & Weiss v. Commonwealth Financial Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 26, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: In this proceeding to determine and enforce an *831attorneys’ lien defendant-appellant did not answer the petition but served a notice of appearance, alleging therein that it appeared specially to object to the court’s jurisdiction, and moved to set aside service of the petition upon it. On October 25, 1960, its motion was submitted to Special Term without oral argument. Petitioners appeared in opposition to the motion and also to argue petitioners’ motion for an order determining and enforcing their lien, which had been adjourned to the same day. Special Term entertained both motions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Raichle, Moore, Banning & Weiss v. Commonwealth Financial Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanford v. 27-29 W. 181st Street Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Cappel v. RKO Stanley Warner Theaters, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Aces Mechanical Corp. v. Cohen Bros. Realty & Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Lipsig, Sullivan, Mollen & Liapakis, P. C. v. ShamyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Costigan v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API