Legal Opinion

Sherrod v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 11, 1979No. CIV-2-77-179PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEESE, District Judge.

The plaintiff moved the Court to admit as additional exhibits for the trial herein two official transcripts of the proceedings in The People of the State of Illinois v. H. Sherrod, criminal action no. 77-1-767826-01 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Municipal Department, First Division. The defendant objected thereto on the ground that such proposed exhibits are irrelevant 1 and, thus, inadmissible. Rule 402, Federal Rules of Evidence.

These court records reflect that a motion to vacate was sustained ex parte on June 29, 1978, and that the state of Illinois…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karkomi v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API