Legal Opinion

State v. Sharpe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 5, 1930No. 30466PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

Defendant was indicted for the murder of Calvin Holden, and was convicted of manslaughter. The record contains six bills of exception, but defendant relies on only two of them for a reversal. The four bills abandoned possess no merit whatever.

The first bill upon which defendant relies for a reversal is one that was taken to a ruling of the court, permitting one of the state’s witnesses, Bamber Husser, to explain on redirect examination why he made statements directly in conflict with those he made on the preliminary trial of the accused. The defendant strenuously urges, and did so before the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cleveland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. State v. RicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. State v. HermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. State v. ForemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API