Legal Opinion

Goeke v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1990No. C-8363PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAUZY, Justice.

This is an administrative appeal involving the requirement for agency fact-findings as set forth in section 16(b) of the Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act (APTRA). The trial court reversed a final order of the Public Utility Commission (Commission) on the ground that it had not met the requirements of section 16(b). The trial court remanded the case to the agency. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. 761 S.W.2d 835. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to the trial court.

In 1983, Houston Lighting & Power…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Banking Board v. Allied Bank Marble FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sam Houston Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Frost v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N OF TEXASCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Goeke v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Public Utility Commission v. GTE-Southwest, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hammack v. Public Utility Com'n of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Meier Infiniti Co. v. Motor Vehicle Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  5. Buddy Gregg Motor Homes, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Board of the Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API