Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Randolph

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1999No. 1998-2685PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 325.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. RANDOLPH. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Randolph,

1999-Ohio-268.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Collecting an illegal or clearly excessive fee—Failing to pay upon request client funds that client is entitled to receive. (No. 98-2685—Submitted February 10, 1999—Decided April 7, 1999.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 97-103. __________________ {¶ 1} On December 8, 1997, relator, Cincinnati Bar…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RandolphOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. GilmartinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. NaumoffOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. AduseiOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. MartoranaOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API