Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington D.C., Inc. v. Horner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 20, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-1751PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

This case features yet another imbroglio arising out of the administration of the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC or Campaign). 1 The origin of this latest legal altercation is the issuance of a regulation by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that would bar an organization granted national eligibility and any one of its affiliates from dual listing in CFC brochures as possible recipients of Campaign funds. Because the Court concludes, for the reasons articulated below, that this regulation is inconsistent with a statute passed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stuttering Found. of America v. SpringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. National Center on Missing & Exploited Children v. HornerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API