Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington D.C., Inc. v. Horner
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
This case features yet another imbroglio arising out of the administration of the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC or Campaign). 1 The origin of this latest legal altercation is the issuance of a regulation by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that would bar an organization granted national eligibility and any one of its affiliates from dual listing in CFC brochures as possible recipients of Campaign funds. Because the Court concludes, for the reasons articulated below, that this regulation is inconsistent with a statute passed by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stuttering Found. of America v. SpringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- National Center on Missing & Exploited Children v. HornerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988