Legal Opinion

National Center on Missing & Exploited Children v. Horner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 7, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-2886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, National Center on Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), seeks to participate in the fall 1988 Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) for the National Capital Area and other unspecified local CFCs. The United States Office for Personnel Management (OPM), which administers CFC, denied NCMEC’s application for admission to the National Capital Area Campaign based on a finding that NCMEC failed to satisfy one of the requirements set forth in the relevant CFC regulations. See 5 C.F.R. Sec. 950.203(b)(9) (1988). 1

NCMEC now brings this action seeking a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Foundation on Economic Trends v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Population Institute v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington D.C., Inc. v. HornerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Conference on Ministry to the Armed Forces v. JamesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API