Legal Opinion
In Re Microsoft Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 20, 2006No. M19-104PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND DECISION GRANTING MOTIONS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS AND VACATING PRIOR ORDER
McMAHON, District Judge.
On March 3, 2006, Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) served International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), Cleary Gottlieb’ Steen & Hamilton LLP (“Cleary Gottlieb”) (counsel to several of Microsoft’s competitors in European antitrust matters), and Mr. Maurits Dolmans, Esq. (a partner in Cleary Gottlieb’s Brussels office) (collectively, “Respondents”) with subpoenas duces tecum in connection with an ongoing antitrust proceeding before the European Commission (“the Commission”).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of PeruCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Schmitz v. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- In Re Application of David Esses for Assistance Before a Foreign Tribunal. David Esses v. Linda Esses HananiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Heraeus Kulzer GmbH v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Ecuadorian v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- In Re VeigaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In re del Valle RuizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- In Re Chevron Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.