Dooley v. Meese
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Saunders county. Tried ¡below before Marshall, J. cited: Briggs v. Murdoch, 13 Pick. [Mass.], 316; Houghton v. Davenport, 23 Id., 237; Dunn v. Rodgers, 43 111., 260; Morris v. Trustees, 15 Id., 269; Kitchen v. Reinshy, 42 Mo., 427; Moore v. Purple, 3 Gilnr. [111.], 149; Malone v. Samuel, 13 Am. Dec., 174. cited: Cowles v. Sch. Dish, 23 Neb., 655; Ratcliff v. Far is, 6 Id., 544; Sioux City R. Co.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action had its origin in a petition by D. C. Miller and others of school district No. 16, and Levi Keiser and others of school district No. 41, both of Saunders county, to the county superintendent of public instruction of said county praying for the changing of the boundary line between said districts so that sections 13,14, and 15 of township 13, range 8, of said county should be attached to district No. 41, instead of, as formerly, to district No. 16, which petitions were filed February 6, 1888.
Petitions were made from each district, and indorsed on each petition appeal’s a list of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Olsen v. GrosshansNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- State ex rel. School District No. 1 v. School District No. 19Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- School District No. Ten v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Proudfit v. School District No. 49Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- School District No. 11 v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1910