State ex rel. School District No. 1 v. School District No. 19
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Sioux county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J. cited: State v. Compton, 28 Neb., 485; Cowles v. School District, 23 Neb., 655; Dooley v. Meese, 31 Neb., 424; State v. Stein, 13 Neb., 532; State v. Hamilton, 29 Neb., 198; State v. Boyd, 31 Neb., 682; State v. School District, 34 Kan., 237; County of Piatte v. Goodell, 97 111., 84; People v. Town of Oran, 121 111., 650.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.
On November 13, 1888, the relator instituted in the court below proceedings in quo warranto against school district No. 19, Sioux county, and Daniel Kline, James T. Mason, and W. H. Johnson, claiming to be the officers of said district, for the purpose of determining the legality of the organization of the said respondent district, and ousting it from exercising the rights, franchises, and privileges of a school district. A general demurrer to the information was sustained, the action dismissed, and the relator prosecutes error to this court.
For a correct understanding of the question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cowles v. School District No. 6Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- School District No. Ten v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Gregory v. School District No. 24Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Dooley v. MeeseNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. McLane v. ComptonNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- School District No. 23 v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Cass CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Head v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- School District No. 8 v. School District No. 15Nebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Kockrow v. WhisenandNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.