Legal Opinion
Providence-Washington Fire Ins. v. Atlanta-Birmingham Fire Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Decided January 11, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Distr|t,t Judge.
The assets the Atlanta-Birmingham Fire Insurance ppmpany and its affairs ai« ⅛ this court for administration, the comji/my having failed on account of severe losses sustained in the San Francisco fire in 1906. The question has arisen as to the respective rights o'l other insurance companies which, had reinsured the Atlanta-Birmingham Fire Insurance Company against risks taken by it, and the rights cj,f the Atlanta-Birmingham Fire Insurance Company against such companies for reinsurance given it by the other companies.
The particular question here for decision is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allemannia Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Baltimore Ex Rel. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The Mutual Safety Ins. Co. v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Consolidated Real Estate & Fire Insurance v. CashowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Eagle Insurance v. Lafayette InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Blackstone v. . Alemannia Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- YHT, Inc. v. Oxford/Progressive GroupHigh Court of American Samoa · 2001