Blackstone v. . Alemannia Fire Ins. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
In the case of Hone v. The Mutual Safety Insurance Co. (1 Sandf. Sup. C.R., 137), it was adjudged that under a contract of re-insurance, the extent of the liability of the re-insurer was not affected by the insolvency of the re-assured, nor by its inability to fulfill its own contract with the original insured. This proposition was maintained by Mr. Justice SANDFORD, giving the judgment of the Superior Court of New York, in a careful and learned opinion, thoroughly setting forth the reasons on which the decision rested and the authorities supporting it. This judgment was affirmed in the Court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- The Mutual Safety Ins. Co. v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allemannia Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Baltimore Ex Rel. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Johannes v. Phenix Insurance Co. of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Globe National Fire Insurance v. American Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Hunt v. New Hampshire Fire Underwriters' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
- Federal Union Ins. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.