Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Frame

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1920No. Civ. No. 2814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought to recover on a promissory note. Defendant’s defense of want of consideration was sustained by the trial judge, and the appeal is taken from the judgment which was entered in his favor.

Margaret E. Griswold was the sister of the defendant. Her first husband, Lumereau, died in the year 1909, and the promissory note in question was made on March 6, 1911, which was prior to the time that the sister married Griswold, who appears here as the administrator of her estate. The promissory note sued upon was among the effects of plaintiff’s intestate. In establishing his defense…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Howard v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Schultz v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Cohen v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Rice v. HowlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Silva v. GordoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Gattavara v. CaldwellWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Meadows v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Meadows v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API