Legal Opinion

Foraker v. Perry Township Rural School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1935No. 25342 and 25370PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The same general jurisdictional question is presented in both of these cases. In the first case, a petition in error was filed directly in this court upon the theory that the procedure is governed and controlled by statutes enacted pursuant to Section 21 of Article II of the Constitution which provides that: “The general assembly shall determine, by law, before what authority, and in what manner, the trial of contested elections shall be conducted”; while in the latter case a petition'in error was filed in the Court of Appeals upon the theory that the procedure was controlled by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. DaveyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Nichols v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In re HawkeOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Werner v. RowleyOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Duncan v. PogueOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mehling v. MooreheadOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Williams v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API