HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentMadsen, J.
¶26 (dissenting) — The court must decide the meaning of the words “derived from interest” in RCW 82.04.4292. Unfortunately, the majority determines the meaning of these words without regard to the context in which they are used and the related statutes that give them meaning. The majority thus disregards the numerous cases in which this court has explained how to determine the plain meaning of a statutory term. In addition, the majority says that it is not essential to determine why the money is received, but it is not only essential, it is the first step in applying this taxing scheme.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.