Legal Opinion
State v. Crenshaw
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 2001No. 78210PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kenneth A. Rocco, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Shawn Crenshaw appeals the sentence imposed upon him as a result of his conviction for failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer, in violation of R.C. 2921.331. In four assignments of error, he urges:
“I. The trial court’s order to pay the county for the cost of his court-appointed counsel is void because the second sentence of R.C. 2941.51(D) and the sixth sentence of R.C. 120.33(A)(4) are the only authority that purport to authorize such a recoupment order and those provisions deny equal protection and due process.
“II. Even if…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. TremblyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. McLeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SpringsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. RileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BrenemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. LoudenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.