Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1990No. 56645-3Published

1DissentDore, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. RCW 4.20.046 and RCW 51.32.040 are compatible with one another and can be harmonized. The enactment of RCW 4.20.046 calls for a reinterpretation of the survivability of claims „ under RCW 51.32.040. I believe that the survival of claims statute clearly governs the survivability of time loss compensation claims and, therefore, I dissent.

The survival of claims statute is clear and unambiguous. That statute provides that:

All causes of action by a person or persons against another person or persons shall survive to the personal representatives of the former and against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RunnelsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ingersoll v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ray v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Harvey v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lutch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API