Legal Opinion

Dove v. Dove

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 2009No. S09A0197, S09X0198Published

1Opinion of the Court

680 S.E.2d 839 (2009)

DOVE

v.

DOVE.

Dove

v.

Dove.

Nos. S09A0197, S09X0198.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

June 15, 2009.

Reconsideration Denied June 30, 2009.

LaFon & Hall, Beverly J. Hall, Roswell, for appellant.

Banks & Stubbs, Robert S. Stubbs, III, Cumming, for appellee.

SEARS, Chief Justice.

We granted appellant Paul Dove's application for interlocutory appeal to consider whether the trial court erred by ruling that the parties' prenuptial agreement was unenforceable because it was required to be attested by two witnesses under OCGA § 19-3-63 but was not. Lauri Dove has filed a cross-appeal, contending…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  3. Scherer v. SchererSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API