Legal Opinion

People v. Brigner

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1999No. 98CA0120PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge VOGT.

Defendant, Marshall E. Brigner, appeals the trial court’s order directing him to pay restitution following his plea of guilty to defrauding a secured creditor. We vacate the order and remand the cause for correction of the mittimus.

The facts in this case are largely undisputed. Defendant agreed to purchase a dairy farm from the victim. As part of that purchase, the victim retained a security interest in the dairy cattle on the farm.

Thereafter, the cattle became ill and were no longer able to produce milk. Defendant therefore sold the cattle for beef, receiving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Cumhuriyet v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. EstesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. CatronColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. BrooksColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. SteinbeckColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. WrightColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. StaffordColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API