Legal Opinion
New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division v. Climax Chemical Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1986No. 9136PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES T. MARTIN, District Judge.
The New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division (EID) requested that Climax Chemical Company (Climax) allow one of its field inspectors to go into the Climax plant in Lea County to inspect certain portions of the premises for compliance with the Hazardous Waste Act. Climax permitted an inspection of part of its premises but denied access to other portions, claiming that the part of the plant to which the inspector was denied access was not subject to the provisions of the Act or the rules and regulations of EID. Climax took the position that entry to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Ray MARSHALL, Secretary of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HORN SEED COMPANY, INC., Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- V-1 Oil Company, a Wyoming Corporation v. State of Wyoming, Department of Environmental Quality Steven P. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- COPAR PUMICE COMPANY, INC. v. MorrisDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- N.M. Construction Indus. Div. v. CohenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- V-1 Oil Company, a Wyoming Corporation v. State of Wyoming, Department of Environmental Quality Steven P. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990