Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Coates

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. Ejectment, by Coates against Rogers. Judgment for plaintiff, at the July Term, 1885. "The defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

The defendant in error brought this action against A. H. Rogers, to recover possession of lot number 243 on- James street, Kansas City, Kansas. The plaintiff claimed title as assignee of the Mastín Bank of Kansas City,. Missouri; the defendant claimed title under a tax deed. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the possession of the lot, subject to the payment by the plaintiff of the amount of $152.09, a lien for taxes upon the premises.

Plaintiff in error says that the petition does not state a cause of action; that there was not sufficient evidence introduced to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cable v. CoatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newton v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Bershears v. Nelson Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. First National Bank v. NordstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. MacRae v. Kansas City Piano Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Mercado v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API