Legal Opinion

Adams v. Bass

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1988No. 8710DC774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s ruling that the action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations, G.S. 1-52, and the subsequent dismissal of her action. Plaintiff asserts that she was the guarantor of the defendant’s note and entitled to subrogation with the same rights as the original creditor. The assignment of collateral, however, makes her primarily liable for payment of the note.

Though it is not necessary to discuss the technical distinctions existing between surety and guarantor in deciding this case, our Supreme Court has previously contrasted the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Pickett v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Bernard v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Davis v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. George v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. George v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API