Legal Opinion

George v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1991No. 9030SC930Published

1Opinion of the Court

404 S.E.2d 1 (1991)

102 N.C. App. 761

Frank GEORGE, d/b/a Frank George Electric, Inc.

v.

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 9030SC930.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 7, 1991.

Creighton W. Sossomon, Highlands, for plaintiff-appellee.

Martin, Cavan & Andersen, P.C. by C. Walker Ingraham, Atlanta, Ga., and Alley, Hyler, Killian, Kersten, Davis & Smathers by Patrick U. Smathers, Canton, for defendant-appellant.

ORR, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and denying defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Vernon v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. George v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Adams v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Adams v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API