Legal Opinion
Automated Systems of Tacoma LLC v. Steris Corporation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 20, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01028Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF CASE NO. C24-01028JLR TACOMA LLC, 11 ORDER Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 STERIS CORPORATION, 14 Defendant. 15 Before the court is Plaintiff Automated Systems of Tacoma LLC’s (“Automated 16 Systems”) second Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) motion to strike Defendant Steris 17 Corporation’s (“Steris”) affirmative defenses. (2d MTS (Dkt. # 54); Reply (Dkt. # 56); 18 see Am. Answer (Dkt. # 52).) Steris opposes Automated Systems’s motion. (Resp. (Dkt. 19 # 55).) The court has reviewed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Chris Kohler v. Flava EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- California ex rel. State Lands Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- The BencleuchDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1924