Legal Opinion

California ex rel. State Lands Commission v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 6, 1981No. C 79-1865 RPAPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AGUILAR, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on plaintiff State of California’s motion to strike the affirmative defenses of the statute of limitations, laches and estoppel asserted by the defendant United States of America in its answer to the State’s complaint to quiet title to the land comprising Hamilton Air Force Base. The Court also has before it the State’s motion for reconsideration of the Magistrate’s ruling compelling production of certain documents.

Factual and Procedural Background

This lawsuit is one of a number of lawsuits seeking a judicial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Novato Fire Protection District v. United States of America U.S. Coast GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Scheble v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API