Rexford v. . Widger
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from the court of chancery, where the case was this : In 1839, Widger and wife recovered against one Randall two judgments in the supreme court, by confession without suit.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the court of chancery, where the case was this : In 1839, Widger and wife recovered against one Randall two judgments in the supreme court, by confession without suit. Rexford and Birdsall were subsequent mortgagees from Randall of certain real estate of Randall, situated in Binghamton, in the county of Broome, on which the judgments were a lien; and they filed their bill in this cause against the judgment creditors, and against the sheriff of Broome county, for the purpose of setting aside the judgments and restraining the sheriffs sale of the lands in question, on the ground of…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court,
upon the authority of the case cited, were of opinion that the bill could not be sustained, and thereupon the decree of the chancellor was affirmed.1
2Cited by6 opinions
- Allerton v. . BeldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Buckingham v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Yormark v. WaldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Buckingham v. CorningNew York Supreme Court · 1881
- Cahn v. Farmers & Traders BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.