Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1888No. 13,415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant owned a mare which he kept in a securely fenced field adjoining the track of the appellee. The mare escaped from the field and entered upon the appellees’s track at a point where it was securely fenced. The appellant endeavored without success to catch her, and she was struck apd killed by one of the appellee’s trains. The mare ran in front of the approaching train and was overtaken by it in a cattle-guard. The engineer and fireman of the appellee “ might have seen the mare from the engine at the distance of one quarter of a mile before the engine struck the mare, and when the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Van AukenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Vandalia Railway Co. v. DulingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API