Legal Opinion

Dueitt v. Barrow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1964No. 49PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NYE, Justice.

E. Barrow, appellee, a paving contractor, recovered judgment against J. P. Dueitt for the balance due on an oral contract for personal services rendered, labor done and materials furnished in the amount of $1373.62, and for $769.88 for additional •extra work, plus $600.00 attorney’s fees.

Dispute arose over the exact amount due and owing to the appellee contractor by appellant. The appellant does not contest on appeal the correctness of the trial court’s award of $1373.62, being the balance due under the original oral contract for paving work. The appellant predicates his appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Ferrous Products Co. v. Gulf States Trading Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kirkwood & Morgan, Inc. v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Texas Gas Corporation v. HankamerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. M. M. M., Inc. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tenneco Oil Company v. Padre Drilling CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N, INC. v. MeierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Wisznia v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Danaho Refining Company v. DietzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Page v. Superior Stone Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API