Legal Opinion
United States v. William Bradshaw
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 19, 1983No. 82-2540PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant-appellant, William Bradshaw, was convicted of conspiring to steal goods moving in interstate commerce and the underlying substantive offense of stealing goods moving in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 659. From those convictions Bradshaw raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court failed to adequately inform Bradshaw of the dangers of multiple representation as required under Fed.R.Crim.P. 44(c); (2) whether Bradshaw’s attorney operated under an actual conflict of interest that affected his representation…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Stuart Steven NobleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Max Allen EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States of America, Plaintif-Appellee v. Biagio Cirrincione and Tom CirrincioneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. David RomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.