Legal Opinion

Hemphill Co. v. Davis Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1950No. 5994_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

This suit is brought to enforce the rights of the owner of United States patent No. 2,306,207 issued to Robert E. Davis on December 22, 1942, relating to a circular knitting machine adapted to knit elastic thread in combination with an inelastic thread in the top of a stocking. The machine was designed to manufacture hosiery composed of the knitted fabric covered by the Davis patent No. 2,306,246 issued on the same day as the patent in suit. The application for the fabric patent was filed June 26, 1935 and the application for the machine patent August 2, 1935. Both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Saranac Automatic MacHine Corp. v. Wirebounds Patents Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. United States Gypsum Co. v. Consolidated Expanded Metal CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Scott & Williams, Inc. v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Pedreiro v. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API