Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Will

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1941No. 32,671PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JULIUS J. Justice.

Action upon an account to recover a balance for COffl §ol(l to Gustave A. Will. His answer was a general denial. Before trial Mr. Will died, and his wife as representative of his estate was substituted as defendant. By amended answer, she “admits that the plaintiff sold and delivered the goods * described in plaintiff’s complaint herein to said G. A. Will” and that they “were of the value” therein “specified.” But, in avoidance, she “alleges in connection therewith that said goods - “ " sold to said G. A. Will, as executor of the estate^ of OHO mm mann, deceased; that “Will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ness v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Germania Bank v. MichaudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Winston v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schunk v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API