Fred J. Kiesel & Co. v. Sun Ins. Office of London
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Utah.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This writ of error challenges a judgment for the defendant in error, the Sun Insurance Office of London, an insurance corporation, in an action brought against, it by the plaintiff in error, Fred J. Kiesel & Co., a corporation, on a policy •of fire insurance upon merchandise that was situated in a warehouse at Ogden, in the state of Utah. One of the clauses of this policy reads: “If a building, or any part thereof, fall, except as the result of fire, all insurance by this policy on such building or its contents shall immediately cease.” The complaint of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Yahn v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Burlington Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Delaware Ins. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Standard Life & Accident Ins. v. McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- McGlother v. Provident Mut. Acc. Co. of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.