Legal Opinion

People v. Petit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2002No. Docket 119348PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether defendant must be resentenced because the trial court did not specifically ask defendant if she wished to allocute, that is, speak on her own behalf, before she was sentenced pursuant to a sentence agreement. The Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal. We conclude that defendant was given an opportunity to allocute as required by MCR 6.425(D)(2)(c). Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s sentence.

*626I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was charged with first-degree murder and felony-firearm for the shooting death of her sister.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. KimbleMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API