Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1932No. 4256PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was by R. W. Holt in trespass to try title to an undivided one-eighth interest in 225 acres of land against A. J. Swanson, Willie Holt, R. E. O'Keefe, and L. A. Norris. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants Willie Holt and A. J. Swanson, induced him, through false and fraudulent representations as to the value of the land involved, to convey the land to Swanson for a grossly inadequate consideration, and that the other defendants, O'Keefe and Norris, purchased certain interests in the land from Willie Holt and A. J. Swanson with knowledge of the fraud practiced upon him by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mansel v. CastlesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Luck v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kittrell v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Fitzgerald v. Evans & HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swanson v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Earnest v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Bridges v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Kilday v. Alamo Post No. 2, American LegionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Reed v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API