Legal Opinion

Bridges v. Wilder

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1935No. 2704PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the 12th day of March, 1931, in cause No. 9097 on the docket of the district court of Shelby county, Brammer Wilder recovered a default judgment against W. A. Bridges and his wife, Mrs. Lucy Bridges, for the sum of $325.33, with foreclosure of a mechanic's, materialman's, and builder's lien on certain property situated in the city of Center, in Shelby county. In a proceeding instituted by W. A. Bridges in the same court against Brammer Wilder, judgment was entered on the 15th day of July, 1933, denying the injunction, and on the prayer of Brammer Wilder judgment was entered nunc pro tunc…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hannon v. HensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Palmo v. S. W. Slayden & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bassett v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Panhandle Const. Co. v. LindseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  5. Luck v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  2. Angelo Clark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Rowena Jenkins Daniels v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. W. A. Bridges v. H. S. WilderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API