Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Holland
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 1989No. 87-5716PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
David Holland, a citizen of Jamaica, was convicted of illegally entering the United States after being deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Relying on United States v. Mendoza-Lopez, 481 U.S. 828, 107 S.Ct. 2148, 95 L.Ed.2d 772 (1987), the appellant challenges the validity of his prior deportation order. We affirm.
I
Holland, a Jamaican citizen, was indicted for illegally entering the United States. Because he had been previously deported, this reentry constituted a felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 1 The appellant argues that the prior deportation hearing violated due…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ka Fung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Rolando Cerda-PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Evaristo Rangel-GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Humberto Nicholas-ArmentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Proa-TovarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Pablo Fernandez-Antonia, AKA "Pablo Fernandez"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Benitez-VillafuerteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Victor Manuel Meraz-ValetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Aurelio Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.