Legal Opinion

United States v. 1,621 Pounds of Fur Clippings

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1900No. 5PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

A.t the May' term of the United States district court for the Northern district of New York, in an action brought by the government for the condemnation of certain merchandise which had been seized by the collector of customs as forfeited to the United States because of a fraudulent undervaluation when entered for importation, the court dismissed the information, and ordered the merchandise released by the collector of customs upon the payment by the claimant of the duties upon the merchandise at its appraised value, “together with the penal duties provided by section 7 of. the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  2. United States v. American Metal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Forty Fort Coal Co. v. KirkendallDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Gray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API