Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 5, 2003No. 14-01-00799-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appealing his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine weighing less than a gram), appellant Donovan Cheviliar Roberts raises two issues asserting the trial court reversibly erred by denying his motion for continuance. We affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

While conducting an undercover investigation of illegal narcotics activity at a Houston night club, Houston police officers engaged in a brief conversation with Jason Waggoner. One of the undercover officers asked Waggoner for $40 worth of crack cocaine, and Waggoner led him to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Ashcraft v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  3. Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Wray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Craig Michael Stricklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004
  2. Dakota Layne Mitchell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
  3. Elbert Misner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Leach, Eddie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. Louis James Stenson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API