Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-2580Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’NEILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Continental Insurance Company brings this action for declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 to determine a question in actual controversy between the parties. 1 More specifically, plaintiff seeks a declaration that it has no duty under an insurance policy issued to Stewart and Nancy Davis to defend or indemnify the estate of their son, Brian Davis, for liability arising out of an automobile accident that occurred on April 25, 1997.
I have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Now before me are plaintiffs motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Township of Center, Butler County, Pennsylvania Dean E. Schweinsberg and Debra J. Oesterling v. First Mercury Syndicate, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Wexler Knitting Mills v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.