Legal Opinion
Bates v. State
Allen Circuit Court
Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
ERROR to Allen common pleas court.
1Opinion of the Court
HURIN, J,
The plaintiff in error was indicted by the grand jury of Allen county for bigamy.
The indictment is based on his marriage to one Isie Dora Miller, while he had an alleged wife living, — one Hazel Ginter Bates.
The State, at the trial of the case, relied upon evidence of what is designated as a common-law marriage of the accused with Hazel Ginter.
This evidence tended to prove that from about December 17, 1904, to some time in 1906, the accused and Hazel Ginter lived together at intervals, cohabiting together as man and wife; that a child was born to them as a result of this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gall v. . GallNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Cartwright v. McGownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Dyer v. BrannockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Tracy v. FreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SavageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Pauline Furber, on Behalf of Roberta Miller and Allen L. Miller, Minor-ClaimantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Pauline Furber, on Behalf of Roberta Miller and Allen L. Miller, Minor-ClaimantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958