Legal Opinion

State v. Savage

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1987No. 85-46PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

It is a well-known rule that a spouse may not testify against the other spouse at a criminal trial. Evid. R. 501 provides for application of statutorily defined privileges, one of which is the privilege to exclude communications or acts made by a husband or wife in the other’s presence. R.C. 2317.02(D). The privilege is held by the non-testifying spouse and may be applied to bar testimony of such communications or acts so long as they were not made “in the known presence” of another. In addition, Evid. R. 601 provides: “Every person is competent to be a witness except: * * * (B) A spouse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RahmanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ruch v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Locke v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Bates v. StateAllen Circuit Court · 1906
  5. Haberty v. StateOhio Circuit Courts · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Reo v. Univ. Hosp. Health Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. RiderOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Mason v. Molinari, Ca2006-05-056 (10-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API