Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Stubblefield v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided July 31, 2002No. 06-01-00121-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrant, Justice

I agree with the majority that the trial court committed harmless error in failing to include an instruction on accomplice witness testimony in the jury charge. However, I respectfully dissent with the majority’s conclusion that the evidence was sufficient to convict Stubblefield of possession of a controlled substance. The majority concludes that there were sufficient affirmative links to justify the jury in finding that Stubblefield possessed contraband and reminds us that proof of joint possession is sufficient to sustain a conviction. Although proof of joint possession would be sufficient…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. McGoldrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API