In the Interest of T.E.H.

OPINION BY

PANELLA, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, T.E.H., A.M., and M.M.B. (collectively, “the juveniles”), challenge the validity of the DNA Act, 44 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 2316, in this consolidated appeal from the orders entered on January 12, 2006, by the Honorable John C. Uhler, Court of Common Pleas of York County. After careful review, we affirm with respect to T.E.H., and reverse with respect to A.M. and M.M.B.

¶2 T.E.H. was adjudicated delinquent on September 19, 2003, on charges of carrying an unlicensed firearm,1 and possession of a firearm by a minor.2 Subsequently, the trial court entered a…