Legal Opinion

Charles M. Dunning Const. Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1953No. Civ. Nos. 3874, 4075Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, Chief Judge.

The parties and the subject-matter being the same in each of these cases the court, on agreement of the parties, consolidated said cases for trial.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $207,041.21 claimed as losses in the performance of a contract it entered into with the United States of America (through its proper agency and hereinafter referred to as the Government or in the alternative the agency involved), on May 25, 1943, designated as contract No. W-957-eng-1890, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed, for the consideration named therein, to furnish certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Warner Const. Co. v. KrugDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
  4. McGann Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Prebilt Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API